BalanceBikeToddler

What Research Says About Balance Bikes

What published research says about balance bikes and early motor development — and the caveats that come with the studies.

By BalanceBikeToddler Editorial Team ·

Short answer: What published research says about balance bikes and early motor development — and the caveats that come with the studies.

Balance bikes are often described as "research-backed." The research is real, it is recent, and it is thinner than the marketing suggests. Here is what the published studies actually measured, what they found, and what they have not shown.

What the studies measured

The English-language literature on balance bikes is small and concentrated. Two peer-reviewed studies from the same Portuguese research group do most of the work.

The 2022 study in the International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health analyzed 2,005 parent responses collected in Portugal between November 2019 and June 2020. Its outcome measure was learning age — the age at which a child first cycled independently. Children whose first bike was a balance bike averaged 4.16 years; those who started with training wheels averaged 5.97; those who started directly on a pedal bike averaged 7.27. The differences were statistically significant.

The 2025 study in the Journal of Functional Morphology and Kinesiology was an intervention: 50 children who could not yet cycle practiced for six sessions on either a balance bike or a training-wheel bike, then moved to a conventional bicycle. Independent-cycling success was 100% in the balance-bike group and about 77% in the training-wheels group. Balance-bike learners were faster at each milestone: self-launch, riding, and braking.

What the research says, stated carefully

Taken together, the studies support a narrow claim: when a balance bike is a child's first bike, they tend to reach independent cycling sooner than children who start with training wheels. The 2025 authors also found that children with higher BMI percentiles took longer to reach balance milestones — a finding about the sample, not a claim about any individual child.

What the research has not shown

This is the part that gets skipped in product marketing. The honest gaps:

  • No long-term skill or safety outcomes. Neither study followed children to see whether balance-bike starters ride more safely, enjoy cycling more, or crash less years later.
  • Small and regional samples. The 2025 study included 50 children from one region; peer reviewers specifically questioned the baseline equivalence of its groups and the strength of its body-composition conclusions.
  • Self-reported data in the 2022 study. Families chose their own tools, so household factors — not just the bike — may explain part of the gap.
  • No dose-response evidence. Nobody has published a study showing how many hours of balance-bike practice produce what outcome.
  • A young literature. Both studies come from one research group; independent replication by other groups is still limited.

"Balance bikes help children learn to cycle sooner" is what the evidence currently supports. Anything stronger — developmental advantages, athletic benefits, safety improvements — is ahead of the data.

How to use this as a parent

The practical reading is simple: start with a balance bike that fits, ride it regularly, and do not stress about the timeline. The average in the 2022 survey is just over four years to independent cycling, but the spread around that average is wide. For fit specifics, our [balance bike by age](/balance-bike-by-age/) guide covers the inseam-to-seat measurement that matters more than any study.

Related Products

Continue reading the latest news or browse the guide library.